Is AI Our Greatest Innovation—Or Humanity’s Last Mistake?

Is AI Our Greatest Innovation—Or Humanity’s Last Mistake?

Geoffrey Hinton, the "Godfather of AI," just won a Nobel Prize—and he’s terrified of what he’s future. The pioneer behind neural networks, whose work laid the foundation for ChatGPT and other AI systems, now warns that humanity may be sleepwalking into a crisis. With tech giants racing to develop smarter AI and regulators lagging behind, Hinton estimates a 10-20% chance that AI could eventually seize control from humans. But why aren’t we listening? Let’s dive in.


🌍 The Tiger Cub Problem: Why AI’s Growth Terrifies Its Creator

  • "We’re raising a cute tiger cub that might kill us." Hinton’s analogy underscores the existential risk: AI’s goals could diverge from humanity’s as it grows smarter.
  • 10-20% chance of AI takeover: Hinton’s chilling prediction—higher than many experts—stems from AI’s ability to self-improve beyond human comprehension.
  • Safety research gets scraps: While companies like Google and OpenAI tout safety, Hinton argues they’re dedicating only a "small fraction" of computing power to it. CBS News found none would disclose exact figures.
  • Military AI U-turn: Hinton criticizes Google for backtracking on ethical pledges, like restricting military applications—a shift he calls "disappointing."

✅ The Fixes: Can We Tame the Tiger?

Hinton proposes radical changes to avoid catastrophe:

  • 33% compute for safety: AI labs should allocate a third of their resources to safety research—up from single-digit percentages today.
  • Global regulation: Binding treaties to prevent unchecked AI development, similar to nuclear arms control.
  • Transparency demands: Mandate disclosures on safety budgets and risk assessments.

Yet, when CBS asked companies like OpenAI and Google for specifics on safety investments, all declined to share numbers—despite publicly supporting "responsible AI."


robot playing piano
Photo by Possessed Photography / Unsplash

⚠️ The Roadblocks: Profit vs. Survival

  • 🚧 "Less regulation, more profit": Hinton accuses Big Tech of lobbying to weaken AI rules while paying lip service to safety.
  • 🚧 Speed over safety: The AI arms race—driven by $300B+ in corporate investments—prioritizes beating rivals, not long-term risks.
  • 🚧 Public complacency: "People haven’t understood what’s coming," Hinton warns, citing limited awareness of AI’s existential stakes.

🚀 Final Thoughts: A 10% Chance Is Too High

Hinton’s warnings aren’t sci-fi—they’re math. A 10-20% risk of human obsolescence is akin to Russian roulette with a 10-chambered gun. Success requires:

  • 📈 Urgent regulatory action: Governments must treat AI like pandemics or nukes—preemptive, not reactive.
  • 🤖 Tech accountability: Tie corporate profits to safety milestones.
  • 🌐 Public pressure: Demand transparency from AI labs.

As Hinton asks: Would you keep a tiger if there’s even a 10% chance it mauls your family? The clock is ticking. What do you think—is AI’s promise worth the peril?

Let us know on X (Former Twitter)


Sources: Analisa Novak, Brook Silva-Braga. "Godfather of AI" Geoffrey Hinton warns AI could take control from humans: "People haven't understood what's coming", 2025-04-27. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/godfather-of-ai-geoffrey-hinton-ai-warning/

H1headline

H1headline

AI & Tech. Stay Ahead.