Should the U.S. Block States from Regulating AI for a Decade? Anthropic’s CEO Says ‘Not So Fast’

Federal vs. State Power: Who Should Rule the Future of AI?

The push to halt state-level artificial intelligence regulation for an entire decade is heating up, with lawmakers, tech leaders, and attorneys general taking their positions. A Republican-backed proposal, attached to President Donald Trump’s tax bill, calls for a sweeping 10-year moratorium on any state-driven AI regulation—just as AI innovation is accelerating. But in a recent New York Times op-ed, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei fired back, calling the move “too blunt” and potentially dangerous for faster-moving technology. Instead, Amodei wants Congress and the White House to set clear, national standards demanding real transparency from AI companies.

So, is a 10-year freeze on local action the answer—or does the U.S. risk falling behind on responsible AI oversight? Let’s dive in.

🚦 The AI Regulation Tug-of-War

• State in Limbo: The proposal would overrule dozens of recent state-level AI laws and regulations—many of which aim to curb high-risk AI deployments rather than stifle all innovation.
• Too Fast, Too Soon? Amodei warns, “A 10-year moratorium is far too blunt an instrument. AI is advancing too head-spinningly fast.”
• No Clear Federal Plan: Without an active federal policy, a state ban leaves America with the “worst of both worlds”—no localized guardrails, yet no nationwide standards protecting consumers, workers, or national security.
• Bipartisan Pushback: Opposition isn’t just from one political side—a bipartisan group of state attorneys general is speaking out against this federal preemption.

Why is this happening? AI technologies are advancing at a breakneck pace. From generative text and image tools to powerful decision-making algorithms, states want to move quickly to prevent misuse and protect citizens—especially where federal action lags or seems uncertain. Meanwhile, tech leaders and some legislators fear a patchwork of regulations might slow innovation or create compliance headaches across 50 different states.

💡 Anthropic’s Solution: National Standards and Radical Transparency

Instead of a decade-long ban, Amodei and Anthropic propose a more flexible—and arguably more future-proof—framework:

• ✅ Create National Transparency Standards: Require all developers of advanced AI models to publicly disclose their safety tests, evaluation protocols, and plans for mitigating risks—before releasing products to the public.
• ✅ Federal Oversight, Not Paralysis: Bring Congress and the White House together to set these rules, ensuring the AI landscape is consistent, clear, and keeps up with the technology’s “head-spinning” pace.
• ✅ Lead by Example: Anthropic, which is backed by Amazon, already publishes details on how it builds and tests its powerful models. Leading competitors like OpenAI and Google DeepMind are following suit—proving it can be done at scale.
• ✅ Legislative Incentives: Ensure laws reinforce such transparency—because as AI gets more advanced (and profitable), corporate incentives to be open could fade.

This approach aims to give Americans real insight into how, why, and with what safeguards AI systems are being built—helping to anticipate and prevent national security or societal risks.

🚧 The Roadblocks: What’s Standing in the Way?

• ⚠️ No National Policy Yet: The U.S. still lacks a comprehensive federal AI law. Inaction means that a moratorium just leaves a legal vacuum.
• ⚠️ Corporate Motivation Shifts: As models become more powerful (and lucrative), the self-imposed transparency currently popular among leading AI firms might not last without legal incentives.
• 🚧 Regulatory Overload: Critics of federal standards worry about one-size-fits-all rules that may not adapt to state-specific risks or values, especially in areas like employment, consumer rights, or privacy.
• ⚠️ Partisan Gridlock: Any national plan will require real bipartisan cooperation—something that’s proven challenging for Congress, particularly when tech innovation races ahead of lawmaking.

🚀 Final Thoughts: National Standards or Stalemate?

Is it better to let states experiment with AI regulation, or should America bet on a single, clear federal approach? What’s certain is that the stakes for transparency—and for public trust in AI—are higher than ever.

• ✅ National standards could streamline oversight and force disclosure on how AI is kept safe.
• 📉 But a 10-year “hands-off” policy might sacrifice necessary protections at a critical moment for AI’s growth.
• 🚀 Success will depend on lawmakers’ ability to act quickly and keep pace with AI’s rapid evolution—without shutting states or innovation down entirely.

What do you think? Should states keep their power to regulate AI, or is a unified federal standard the way forward? Drop your thoughts in the comments!

Let us know on X (Former Twitter)

Sources: Reuters. Anthropic CEO says proposed 10-year ban on state AI regulation 'too blunt' in NYT op-ed, June 5, 2025. https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/anthropic-ceo-says-proposed-10-year-ban-state-ai-regulation-too-blunt-nyt-op-ed-2025-06-05/