AI’s Existential Crossroads: Can Humanity Control Its Own Creation?

Will AI uplift humanity—or render us obsolete? As tech giants race to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI), philosophers like Christopher DiCarlo warn we’re hurtling toward a future where machines could outthink, outmaneuver, and potentially endanger humanity. With projects like OpenAI’s Stargate consuming energy rivaling small nations, the stakes have never been higher. Let’s dive in.

🌍 The AI Arms Race: Power, Profit, and Existential Risk

• Tech Titans at War: OpenAI (Sam Altman), Google DeepMind (Demis Hassabis), and Anthropic are locked in a U.S.-centric race for AGI dominance. China’s role remains murky but competitive.
• Stargate’s Energy Hunger: Texas’s $100B+ compute farm, spanning Central Park’s size, could drain 12% of the U.S. power grid by 2026—forcing reliance on nuclear energy.
• AGI’s Unpredictability: Once AI achieves recursive self-improvement, DiCarlo warns, “We have no idea if it’ll align with human values—or view us as obstacles.”
• 5% = Unacceptable Risk: Even a 5% chance of AGI causing human extinction, per DiCarlo, is akin to boarding a plane with a 1-in-20 crash risk.

✅ Proposed Safeguards: Ethics, Regulation, and Global Unity

• Anthropic’s Safety-First Model: Founded by ex-OpenAI ethicists, it prioritizes “Constitutional AI” to embed moral guardrails.
• International Oversight: The UK’s AI Safety Institute and EU’s AI Act push for transparency, while DiCarlo advocates a global regulatory body akin to the IAEA.
• Value Alignment: Teaching AI systems principles like the “no harm” rule and golden standard—though DiCarlo admits, “We can’t guarantee it’ll stick post-AGI.”

🚧 Roadblocks: Greed, Complexity, and Political Paralysis

• The Trillion-Dollar Incentive: First-maker of AGI could monopolize global markets, creating a 50-year economic gap (Sam Harris).
• Black Box Dilemma: AI’s decision-making processes remain opaque. As DiCarlo notes, “We won’t know if it’s plotting or complying.”
• U.S. Regulatory Retreat: Post-Biden, the White House’s lax stance (e.g., Paris Summit 2025) risks a “drill, baby, drill” AI boom.

🚀 Final Thoughts: Cooperation or Catastrophe?

AGI’s promise—curing diseases, revolutionizing education—is undeniable. But success hinges on:

• 📈 Global treaties enforcing transparency and ethical benchmarks.
• 🤖 Embedding fail-safes (e.g., “lysine contingency” for AI).
• 🌐 Avoiding a Hobbesian free-for-all among nations and corporations.

Will humanity rise to the challenge—or sleepwalk into oblivion? What do YOU think?

Let us know on X (Former Twitter)

Sources: Willis Ryder Arnold and Deborah Becker. Ask the Ethicist: How to Create Guardrails for the AI Age, April 25, 2025. https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2025/04/25/ethics-ai-artificial-intelligence-human