Is Meta Playing Fast and Loose With Your Data—Again?

Meta’s to train its AI on E.U. user data without consent—and privacy advocates are furious. The company claims it has a “legitimate interest” to scrape public Facebook and Instagram posts starting May 27, 2025, but Austrian nonprofit noyb is threatening a class-action lawsuit. Is this another case of Big Tech prioritizing innovation over privacy? Let’s dive in.

🌍 The Data Dilemma: Why Meta’s AI Plans Are Sparking Outrage

• 📅 May 27, 2025 Deadline: Meta plans to resume training AI models on E.U. user data after pausing in June 2024 due to regulatory pushback.
• 🔐 Opt-Out vs. Opt-In: Meta argues it doesn’t need explicit consent, relying instead on GDPR’s “legitimate interest” clause. Users must manually object to exclusion.
• 📉 10% Threshold: noyb claims even if only 10% of users consent, Meta would still harvest enough data to train AI in European languages and cultural contexts.
• ⚖️ Legal Precedent: In 2023, Meta abandoned “legitimate interest” for targeted ads after GDPR challenges, switching to consent—a precedent noyb says applies here.

✅ Meta’s Defense: “We’re Being Transparent”

Meta insists it’s playing by the rules:

• ✅ User Control: The company claims it offers a “clear” opt-out process for AI training via settings and notifications.
• 🌐 Cultural Necessity: Meta argues scraping public posts is essential to capture Europe’s linguistic diversity for AI models.
• 🤖 Industry Norms: While rivals like Google avoid social data for AI, Meta claims its approach mirrors standard practices in data utilization.

🚧 The Roadblocks: Legal Risks and Regulatory Silence

• ⚠️ GDPR Non-Compliance: noyb argues Meta’s opt-out system violates GDPR’s requirement for explicit consent when processing sensitive data.
• 💬 Max Schrems’ Critique: “Meta’s absurd claims that stealing everyone’s data is necessary for AI are laughable. Other providers don’t use social data and build better models.”
• 🔇 Regulatory Inaction: National data authorities have yet to rule on AI training legality, leaving Meta to “take huge legal risks,” per the nonprofit.

🚀 Final Thoughts: A High-Stakes Gamble

Meta’s strategy hinges on two risky assumptions:

• 📈 Legal Gray Area: If courts side with noyb, fines could reach 4% of global revenue (€1.3B+ based on 2023 figures).
• 👥 User Apathy: Will E.U. users bother opting out? Low engagement could hand Meta a de facto victory.

This isn’t just about AI—it’s a battle for GDPR’s soul. Should companies profit from public data without explicit consent, or is Meta crossing a line? Sound off below.

Let us know on X (Former Twitter)

Sources: Ravie Lakshmanan. Meta to Train AI on E.U. User Data From May 27 Without Consent; Noyb Threatens Lawsuit, May 15, 2025. https://thehackernews.com/2025/05/meta-to-train-ai-on-eu-user-data-from.html